Balanced opinion for a reasonable US foreign policy in English and French as well.
Thursday, June 29, 2006
The 911 after effects
Your debit-card under the Patriot Act
"Under the Patriot Act we are unable at this time to process your debit-card, we apologize for the inconvenience."
Could someone explain me what it really means PLEASE? I SMELL A RAT, A BIG RAT!
Bush katel
It's an arabic expression that means basically: it is forbidden to kill in the name of liberty. It is a muslim point of view based on values prohibited inside the Q'ran. For example it has been clearly established that a Muslim shoult not kill another Muslim or even other people, but some Muslims kill people in the name of Allah because Allah said Muslims have to be good but do not have to listen to other people if they are forced to do things that they do not feel right.
Now on the other side, inside the West, we have also people killing other people in the name of Freedom. It is the same thing than the Q'ran but this time these are westerners that accept easier this point of view, they think that Democracy is the remedy against everything that is evil. It even became a messianic vocation to do that, whenever they feel other people are wrong.
First of all, killing people is bad, whether it is in the name of Allah or in the name of Freedom. Bush kills in the name of freedom because he thinks that freedom is above everything, even above UN/international laws, and Muslims kill people in the name of Allah because religion is above everything. Some people use their God for their own politics, and other use their own politics for their own God. This is the uncompatibility of our point of views based on values, and everybody thinks they reached wisdom because they accept killing people.
THAT IS WRONG.
The truth of the matter is: THOU SHALT NOT KILL. It is written in the Q'ran and in the Bible.
People who kill other people are called murderers. It is so easy to call somebody a terrorist and kill this person in the name of freedom or even torturing this person. On the other side it is so easy to kill this person because they don't share the values of Allah. It is all about revenge and nothing else and international laws cannot buy off revenge if people do not respect them. MAy I suggest it is time that international laws write a conventional code of conduct to prohibit killing in the name of something, not in another century but in this very same century.
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Are we missing the big picture?
Over the past decade reasearch by Nisbett and his colleagues has surprised the social sciences with numerous studies showing that Westerners and East Asians think differently.
Westerners tend to be analytical and pay more attention to the key, or focal, objects in a scene—for example, concentrating on the woman in the "Mona Lisa," as opposed to the rocks and sky behind her.
East Asians, by contrast, tend to look at the whole picture and rely on contextual information when making decisions and judgments about what they see, Nisbett said. (See sidebar at lower right.)
The new study was designed to determine if the difference in the thought processes of East Asians and Westerners affects how Westerners and East Asians physically look at the world.
To find out, the researchers measured eye movements of 45 U.S. and Chinese students as they looked at photographs that featured single focal objects against complex backgrounds.
For example, one image showed a tiger by a stream in a forest. Another image showed a fighter jet flying over a mountainous landscape.
When test subjects looked at the pictures, differences emerged between the U.S. and Chinese students within the first second of an average viewing, Nisbett said.
"Americans are looking at the focal object more quickly and spend more time looking at it," he said. "The Chinese have more saccades [jerky eye movements]. They move their eyes more, especially back and forth between the object and the [background] field."
The finding suggests that East Asians literally spend more time putting objects into context than Americans do. The differences are not just reflected in how individuals recall and report their memories but in how they physically see an image in the first place.
The study, which was led by Nisbett's graduate student Hannah-Faye Chua, is reported tomorrow in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"Westerners are taught to pay attention to objects that are important to them, to have goals that they can follow," he said. "East Asians are more likely to pay attention to the social field. ..."
Nisbett traces the origins of the variation to at least 2,500 years ago. At that time collaborative, large-scale agriculture was the primary driver of the East Asian economy. For most workers, economic survival required paying attention to the person in charge as well as co-workers in the fields. Context was important.
By contrast, ancient Greek society—the prototypical Western society—was characterized by individualistic activities, such as hunting, fishing, and small-scale farming.
The difference, Nisbett said, still holds today. East Asian societies tend to be more socially complex than Western societies. Understanding context, therefore, has more value in East Asia than in the West.
Characterizing Differences
Anthropologist Alan Fiske said the researchers' data is "very sound." But he questions the complex social reasons that the study authors use to explain the differences.
"Social scientists have not been successful in characterizing in absolute general terms what the difference is between East Asian and European-American societies," said Fiske, the director of the Center for Culture, Brain, and Development at the University of California, Los Angeles. "We all agree there are huge differences, but [they're] difficult to characterize."
Nevertheless, Fiske said, the study shows "a statistically significant and scientifically interesting" difference in how Chinese and Americans view a scene. This difference, he added, strengthens the argument for multicultural teamwork in business and academe.
Fiske said the differences revealed by the study are not so great that people from Western and East Asian cultures can't understand each other when speaking the same language, he said. "But it suggests people have different strengths in remembering and noticing things, and that would be valuable."
Nisbett, the lead study author, said that the research also has implications for international relations. "Understanding there are differences and why these differences exist can be very helpful," he said.
We are just a dust inside Humanity. What may be true today at a geopolitical level may turn out to be wrong at the historical scale. Human beings at the present time are able to look at the big picture not from the inside out but from the outside in. But today we live in a world where you have to agree with the MSM: they bring you the facts to their own way, only so that you can agree with them. Critical thinking has been marginalized especially in wars. Freedom is not about lying, it is first about telling the truth.
Monday, June 26, 2006
Egyptian editor jailed for defaming Mubarak
CAIRO (Reuters) - An Egyptian court sentenced a newspaper editor who has repeatedly criticised President Hosni Mubarak to one year in jail on Monday for defaming the head of state, court sources said.
They said Ibrahim Eissa, editor of the anti-government weekly al-Dustour newspaper, received a one year sentence for publishing an article in April detailing a lawsuit against the president and his family.
That lawsuit had accused Mubarak of selling off state enterprises too cheaply and squandering foreign aid. Eissa's frontpage columns have regularly attacked both Mubarak, president since 1981, and his family.
Two other defendants in Monday's defamation case, another al-Dustour journalist and the man who filed the original lawsuit against Mubarak, also received one year jail terms.
All three were to remain free on bail of 10,000 Egyptian pounds pending an appeal.
The Egyptian Organisation for Human Rights expressed concern over the ruling, saying that giving jail terms to journalists would "shackle freedom of the press in Egypt".
Mubarak pledged two years ago to work to abolish imprisonment for publishing offences, but the government has never asked parliament to amend the law.
Egyptian journalists have staged several demonstrations asking the government to fulfil Mubarak's promise.link here
Another "President" that does not respect what he pledged.
Saturday, June 24, 2006
Chemical weapons found in Iraq ‘too old to be of use’
Intelligence officials said the arms were produced before the 1991 Gulf War and are probably too old to be of use.
The officials were responding to a report circulated by two Republican politicians that says coalition forces had recovered about 500 weapons with mustard or sarin agents, and that more could be discovered around Iraq.
Senator Rick Santorum and House Intelligence Chairman Peter Hoekstra issued a one-page summary of the intelligence report.
Their announcement included the claim, “we have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq”.
But intelligence officials said last night that those weapons were produced before the 1991 Gulf War and there is no evidence to date of chemical munitions manufactured since then.
They said an assessment of the weapons concluded they are so degraded that they could not now be used.
They probably would have been intended for chemical attacks during the Iran-Iraq war, said David Kay, who headed the US weapons-hunting team in Iraq from 2003 until early 2004.
He said experts on Iraq’s chemical weapons are in “almost 100% agreement” that sarin nerve agent produced in the 1980s would no longer be dangerous.
“It is less toxic than most things that Americans have under their kitchen sink at this point,” Mr Kay said.
And any of Iraq’s 1980s-era mustard would produce burns, but it is unlikely to be lethal, he added.
The newly declassified military intelligence report was released by National Intelligence director John Negroponte.
The US Government has long since given up hope of finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, with an official concluding that any stocks which existed had been destroyed.
However some believe they could yet be found. Some, such as former Air Force General Thomas McInerney have claimed that the weapons were smuggled across the border to Syria.
Yesterday’s New York Times included an interview with former Air Force investigator Dave Gaubatz who said he knew of four sites where locals had claimed that chemical weapons were buried in concrete bunkers.
link here
Un nouvel avion au Pentagon
Les USA construisent toutes ces armes pour faire quoi alors? Faudrait p-e se reveiller les Europeens.
What's going on in Ramadi?
Most of the city’s people do not support the occupation of their country and a considerable number of them have taken up arms against the invaders. They are fighting in defense of their country.
There were no WMD in Iraq. The reasons for going to war have all proved to be false. The war was a transparent act of unprovoked aggression against a defenseless people. This is no longer an arguable point.
There are 9 permanent bases being constructed in Iraq’s main oil fields. These bases provide absolute proof in "brick and mortar" of the war’s real objective.
link here
Friday, June 23, 2006
List of accusations in Iraq stuns experts
But the number and gravity of the latest allegations have drawn the greatest outcry against U.S. military actions since the Abu Ghraib prison abuses.
“All of a sudden there seem to be charges right and left,” said Loren Thompson at the Lexington Institute, a defense think tank in Arlington, Va. “It clearly has happened in some cases. But it’s hard to tell whether this is a pattern of wrongdoing on our part or just a pattern of closer supervision.”
link here
Closer supervision is a faith-based language.
La canicule a Vegas
Lorsque l'on sort en ville et que l'on ouvre la porte de voiture les temperatures s'elevent a 70 degres et on se brule les doigts sur le volant (bonjour les sieges en cuir si l'on porte des shorts) . Sur les passages cloutes on arrive meme a ressentir la temperature des pots d'echappement qui surchauffent l'atmosphere. Ici le gros probleme dans l'Ouest et le Sud des USA ce sont les gens qui laissent ou qui oublient leurs enfants dans les voitures et la perte enfantile est imminente apres quelques minutes seulement. Ca arrive trop souvent.
Las Vegas a la 2ieme ville la plus chaude des USA avec en tete a 2 heures de route la ville de Phoenix en Arizona ou les temperatures sont de l'ordre de 2 a 3 degres superieurs. Pour trouver des temperatures au-dessus de 50 degres, il faut aller dans la Vallee de la Mort (Death Valley), mais il faut vraiment etre fou pour aller se promener la-bas.
Et demain je prendrai quelques photos si je vais me promener a Vegas.
Mexico Leftist Ahead in Presidential Race: Poll
link here
Wednesday, June 21, 2006
Iran is not isolated
Mr Ahmadinejad's latest success came at last weekend's meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, a pan-Asian economic and security grouping dominated by China and Russia. Iran hopes to win full SCO membership soon.
link here
It's all about an oil pipeline that is going to be built from Iran to Pakistan, and the TSE (Teheran Stock Exchange) that did not open yet.
Freedom has NO cost
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
Hard Power VS Soft Power in the Middle-East
link here
Petit rappel historique pour bien rafraichir la memoire des Republicains
Si l'on veut ameliorer l'image de l'Amerique, ca ne passe pas dans l'ecriture d'abord (propagande), mais dans les faits, alors l'ecriture viendra apres et non l'inverse.
Etre gay dans l'armee americaine (being gay in the US army)
Il y aurait 65.000 homo- et bisexuels dans les forces armees americaines.
un petit lien en anglais ici
Les USA sont ils un etat voyou?
Liberte et Democratie sont 2 mots futils pour rassembler les ideaux de l'Homme et de la societe constituee d'hommes; pourtant la Democratie generalement nee de la revolte de l'homme, non d'un pouvoir autoritaire qui pretend detenir l'autorite morale de la Democratie, qui plus est la liberte est suffisante a soi-meme; un pays peut partir dans les flammes de l'enfer mais l'homme aura toujours sa liberte. Pourquoi doit-on tuer des gens aux noms de la liberte et de la democratie? Pourquoi les medias americains ont celebre la mort de Al Zarkawi mais ne sont aucunement indignes de la mort d'un enfant de 5 ans? Et surtout ou est la part d'humilite de la politique etrangere des USA?
Un fois un Vietcong dit a un prisonnier americain: "avant la guerre vous etiez nos heros, on partageait les meme valeurs, on lisait vos livres, on regardait vos films, et une de nos phrases etaient "etre aussi riche et sage qu'un Americain". Que s'est il passe depuis?." Les choses ont bien change ici, peut-etre elles n'ont jamais change en fait. On vit dans ce carcan de valeurs, de liberte et de democratie; mais si vous enlevez les armes il n'existe plus rien dans ce coeur mis a nu. Dans les medias il y a toujours eu ce cote a une face, ou l'on montre ce que font les troupes US a l'etranger, mais on ne montrera jamais l'opposition que l'on appelle "resistants", "insurges", ou encore "terroristes". Le tabou est reel ici et l'on continue a se voir en tant qu'un pays grandiose meme si l'on pratique la torture a decouvert, envoie des prisonniers dans des goulags, falsifient des documents pour partir en guerre en Irak, et parle d'aide humanitaire en bombardant la Yougoslavie pendant 78 jours.
Je vous propose 2 essais contradictoires:
- L'un de Noam Chomsky qui ecrit que les USA ne sont pas un etat voyou bien qu'ils pratiquent des attaques terroristes.
- L'autre de William Blum qui ecrit apres avoir travaille pour la CIA qu'effectivement les USA sont un etat voyou.
Ca fait vraiment mal au coeur de se trouver dans un pays grandiose, les Americains sont des gens comme tout le monde vous savez, mais j'encaisse tres mal la politique etrangere des USA.
Le pire c'est que les Americains doivent leur bonheur de vivre dans ce merveilleux pays justement a cause de la politique etrangere des USA; la encore c'est une contradiction. Je n'ai jamais eu peur d'une attaque terroriste aux USA, en revanche j'ai peur de me faire racketer dans les rues de Vegas, et j'ai peur de la violence des Americains. Je ne me sens plus du tout Americain depuis la guerre en Irak, j'ai trop honte.
La preparation de l'intelligence avant la guerre en Irak
Monday, June 19, 2006
Les armes de destruction massive et ses repercussions
- Les liens terroristes qui n'existent pas
- Les ADM en Irak qui n'existent pas non plus
Je tenais a vous rappeler quand meme que les USA n'attaqueront jamais un pays qui ont des ADM, et encore moins une bombe nucleaire. Ca fait partie de leur doctrine et leur doctrine reste inchangee a ce jour.
Les ADM en Irak etait un mensonge d'Etat, Saddam Hussein n'avait jamais ete une menace a la securite nationale des USA. Quelques mois apres la guerre en Irak j'ai interpele un agent du Pentagon en lui posant la question suivante: "pourquoi avez-vous menti sur les ADM en Irak?" et le mec m'a juste donne cette reponse "I am sorry but we had to do it".
Thursday, June 15, 2006
A leftist President for Mexico?
Mexico's Manuel Lopez Obrador may follow Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales as the next Latin leftist leader. And if he wins a bitterly contested election next month, this time the revolution will be just across the US border.
David Usborne reports from Tizimin.
link here
So much oil in Mexico (2 new oilfields were discovered in Mexico a few months ago) for so much poverty in the South.
Wednesday, June 14, 2006
Guantanamo gives ammunition to US critics
Days after three inmates committed suicide, triggering a new international row over the jail, Bush said he would like to shut down Guantanamo, but that some detainees were too dangerous to release.
An Afghan envoy has already announced that he expects all 96 Afghan nationals at the camp to be repatriated soon. But Bush said there had to be a plan to empty Guantanamo before action could be taken.
"I'd like to close Guantanamo," Bush told a White House news conference after returning from a surprise visit to Baghdad.
"But I also recognize that we're holding some people that are darned dangerous, and that we'd better have a plan to deal with them in our courts."
"No question, Guantanamo sends, you know, a signal to some of our friends -- provides an excuse, for example, to say, 'The United States is not upholding the values that they're trying (to) encourage other countries to adhere to.'"
"My answer to them is, is that we are a nation of laws."
"Eventually, these people will have trials and they will have counsel and they will be represented in a court of law."
Bush said the best way to handle Guantanamo detainees, many picked off the battlefields of " type="hidden"> SEARCH
News | News Photos | Images | Web
The US administration is waiting for the Supreme Court to make a decision in on the legality of military tribunals being held at Guantanamo. The Supreme Court ruling is imminent.
European governments, a UN human rights panel and various rights groups have called on the United States to shut down Guantanamo. Opponents of the camp have stepped up criticism since three suicides of inmates last Saturday.
There are about 460 inmates at the camp, most held there as "enemy combatants" since early 2002 without charge or access to a lawyer.
The US military faced new protests after four American journalists were ordered to leave Guantanamo Bay. The Charlotte Observer newspaper said its photographer and reporter were "expelled" along with journalists from the Miami Herald and Los Angeles Times.
The Observer said the reporters received an email message which quoted a directive from Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld ordering them to leave on the first plane to Miami on Wednesday.
The US Defence Department denied the four had been expelled, but a spokesman, Lieutenant Commander J.D. Gordon admitted they were asked to leave. "They had no purpose to be there. They are already there longer than they needed to be and they left," he told AFP.
The Miami Herald and Los Angeles Times reporters were believed to have arrived in Guantanamo to cover events after the suicides of two Saudi and one Yemeni inmates.
The New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights, which provides lawyers for many inmates said it "forcefully condemned the expulsion of reporters."
Gitanjali Gutierrez, one of the centre's attorneys, said: "At a time when the administration must be transparent about the deaths at Guantanamo, they are pulling down a wall of secrecy and avoiding public accountability. This crackdown on the free press makes everyone ask what else they are hiding down there?"
_____________________________
"My answer to them is, is that we are a nation of laws."
Really?
Opinion of a DEA agent about drugs and violence
- the crime rate is rising where there are more home foreclosures -
